For as long as I can remember, I've been working with just over 6 (I think it realistically comes in at 6.1) ...and honestly, to meet my needs, I think that's big enough. I have a friend who likes to show off his 8.0, but when I compare his equipment to mine, I really don't see any difference... especially with performance, 'mkay? Just for the record, I think Paul walks around with at least a 7.0, stuffed into his trousers...and I mean STUFFED. It is seriously thick (and white).
So, does size really matter?
I was looking at pictures of various models online this morning (I'm partial to the black ones), and I was blown away by all of the eye candy and by all of the choices available to my sweaty, needy, shaky little hands.
But I have to ask: is anything over 10 really necessary? I mean isn't that overkill? For example: I saw a model that came in at 14.7 ...Holy Schmokes...now that's a lot of mega pixels.
Y'all know I'm talking about digital cameras, right?
My lazy camera died last week, and now I have to replace it. So I'm throwing this out to the peanut gallery: Do I really want to see my zits that well defined? Is there a big difference in a camera with 8.0 vs 10.0 megapixels? I don't see a big difference in price so I'm leaning towards a 10.0 camera.
Any thoughts or comments are very much welcomed.